?

Log in

No account? Create an account

So, in light of my SD400 camera having liberated itself (or had… - Nothing to See Here — LiveJournal

Mar. 5th, 2007

06:18 pm

Previous Entry Share Next Entry

Comments:

[User Picture]
From:surpheon
Date:March 6th, 2007 04:35 am (UTC)
(Link)
Oh, and the SD900 is a floozy - sure the titanium is fetching, but there isn't even IS hiding in those curves.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:mavjop
Date:March 6th, 2007 05:38 am (UTC)
(Link)
*nod* Yeah. Well, I mean, I actually love that the SD900 exists. A 10.0MP camera for under $400?! That's awesome! ... but I'd rather have lower resolution and IS (also frigging incredible at around $400).

As for the SD700 IS vs. SD800 IS:

I wouldn't have any expectation of the 800 producing noticably better pictures than the 700 per se. There's two fairly simple differences between the two: wide-angle lens and resolution (oh, and amount of zoom, but 3.8x-4.0x doesn't seem hugely important). Resolution seems unimportant, but having the ability to take wider-angle photos would be really nice. It is something I often wish I could do.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)